Three US Newspapers Reverse 100-Year-Old Stand on Death Penalty

This is incredible news!

Published on Friday, May 11, 2007 by Inter Press Service

Three US Newspapers Reverse 100-Year-Old Stand on Death Penalty

by Eli Clifton

WASHINGTON – Three established U.S. newspapers, two of them among the 10 largest
in the country, in three different states have in the past weeks abandoned their
century-old support of the death penalty and become passionate advocates of a
ban on state-sponsored killing.

The newspapers — the Chicago Tribune in Illinois, the smaller Sentinel in
Pennsylvania and the Dallas Morning News in Texas — announced their change of
heart in strongly-argued editorials following a series of investigative
articles highlighting the flaws in the death penalty system in their states and

“I think in a word it’s the issue of innocence that has brought about these
editorials,” Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty
Information Center, told IPS. “The weight of evidence in death penalty cases as
seen and confirmed in DNA testing has made the death penalty too risky.”

The Chicago Tribune said its “groundbreaking” reporting suggested that innocent
people had been convicted and executed. Two cases in Texas were cited. Also
over the last 30 years more than 130 people had been released from death row in
the U.S. after evidence was presented that undermined the cases against them. In
that time, Illinois had executed 12 people and freed 18 from death row.

“The evidence of mistakes, the evidence of arbitrary decisions, the sobering
knowledge that governments can’t provide certainty that the innocent will not
be put to death — all that prompts this call for an end to capital punishment.
It is time to stop killing people in the people’s name,” the Chicago Tribune
wrote, reversing its pro-capital punishment position held since 1869.

Pennsylvania’s Sentinel newspaper, founded in 1861, also came out editorially
against capital punishment after its reporters highlighted the
“ineffectiveness” of the death penalty system in the state.

“The death penalty is useless,” the newspaper wrote in its Apr. 3 editorial.

The state’s lengthy appeals process created an almost indefinite stay of
execution. This meant the numbers on Pennsylvania’s death row were steadily
increasing. There were now 221 on death row, the fourth largest number of any
state in the country. This was a huge expense for the taxpayers, the newspaper

“We are left with a grueling process that in the end only guarantees more
suffering for the victims’ families and society at large as faith in the
justice system erodes,” the editorial said. The majority of public opinion in
the U.S. now favoured prison without parole rather than capital punishment —
either out of “frustration with the system or revulsion at the punishment”.

“The pendulum is swinging away from Pennsylvania’s position on a law it cannot
even execute,” the editorial concluded.

The issue of race was also playing a major role in the fall in public support
for the death penalty, particularly in Pennsylvania, Brian Evans of Amnesty USA
told IPS. “There is a lot of doubt about the death penalty especially in
Pennsylvania because of the disproportionate racial mix of those on death row,”
he said.

In Texas, the Dallas Morning News reversed its century-old support for the death
penalty in an editorial on Apr. 15, citing mounting evidence that the state had
wrongly convicted a number of people in capital trials and probably executed at
least one innocent man.

Carlos De Luna was executed in 1989 for the murder of a petrol station
attendant, although there was no forensic evidence linking him to the crime.
Later, another man boasted to relatives that De Luna had been convicted for a
murder he had committed.

In a second disturbing case cited by the newspaper for its change of mind over
the death penalty, Ernest Ray Willis was convicted of the murder of two women
in 1987. A federal judge later found prosecutors had administered
anti-psychotic drugs to Willis during his trial to give him a “glazed over”
appearance and show he was “cold-hearted”. Prosecutors had also suppressed
evidence and provided no physical proof or eyewitnesses. Questions were also
raised about the competence of the court-appointed defense lawyers.

The sentence was overturned. Another death row inmate also confessed to the
killings. Willis was released after 17 years on death row.

“This board has lost confidence that the state of Texas can guarantee that every
inmate it executes is truly guilty of murder,” the Dallas Morning News wrote.

“We do not believe that any legal system devised by inherently flawed human
beings can determine with moral certainty the guilt of every defendant
convicted of murder. That is why we believe the state of Texas should abandon
the death penalty — because we cannot reconcile the fact that it is both
imperfect and irreversible.”

The number of death sentences handed down in the U.S. has been steadily
decreasing as public opinion in support of capital punishment has been falling.
Some 315 death sentences were handed down in 1995, 128 in 2005 and 102 last

In the last five years, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that it is
unconstitutional to execute juveniles and the mentally retarded. Thirteen of
the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia currently do not have the death

Copyright © 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and
discover new web pages.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s