Horowitz feels threatened by 44 year old professor, won’t attend NCA without bodyguard

Well, InsideHigherEd today reported that NCA has withdrawn its invitation to David Horowitz to debate at its annual meeting this November. See story at http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/02/19/horowitz .

Here is my response:

My reasons for not welcoming Horowitz have less to do with his anti-intellectualism (for he is, in a Gramscian sense, an intellectual organic to the ruling class) than with with decidedly opportunistic and explicitly McCarthyist m.o. The man is about persecuting intellectuals, not engaging them.

I have said it before and I’ll say it again: We may remember these years as the “Horowitz years” in the same way that people remember McCarthyism if we do not successfully interrupt his campaign to purge critical intellectuals from the academy.

NCA’s decision is proof, in fact, that protest (even simply the “threat” of protest) works. I find it ironic that a communication association housing some prominent social movement scholars fears peaceful protest so much. But the implication that I or others would pose a physical threat to DH is ridiculous. He can play the martyr but the fact of the matter is, he is not getting a credible hearing. He can whine all he wants to.

Getting Ann Neal, instead, however is no victory and now we must strategize as to how to respond productively but strongly to her agenda as well. ACTA (her outfit) was the organization behind the Churchill firing; their report called him “low hanging fruit,” and intimated that his case was just the beginning of their quieter efforts to rid universities of activists.

I believe that the influence of these folks is waning given recent shifts in the national political climate. However, I believe that they must always be challenged in public in the way that McCarthy–once dismissed as a crank–should have been from the get-go.

1 thought on “Horowitz feels threatened by 44 year old professor, won’t attend NCA without bodyguard”

  1. Horowitz needs a bodyguard not because he likes it, he has been physically threated because he uses he right to speak freely. The decison not to hear him is a sad commentary on the lack of the left to hear any opinion that makes them feel “uncomfortable”. Maybe one could learn something from Mr. Horowitz. He is a threat because he has something to say, and to censor him is telling and chilling. I am sickened by the ad hominem attacks on the man. Shame on academia.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s